Is AI a Threat to “Destroy Humanity” or is the Real Threat Those Who Control the Technology?

A couple of weeks ago a 27-year-old AI researcher, Jacob Coxon, resigned from Anthropic stating that he was afraid that in about 10 years from now "AI will kill us all." He posted his remarks on X from a new account, and yet it went viral immediately, suggesting that it was a planned event. When it passed 120 million views, Elon Musk himself stated that he had never seen something like this before from "a new account with almost no prior activity.” This claim from a 27-year-old about the future of humanity then went viral and dominated the news stream for over a week. It prompted calls for legislation to control AI, and some of the largest AI Chat Bot producers stated that the development of AI should slow down, which both President Donald Trump and China President Xi rejected, as China called it "fear mongering." This story followed stories last month (August, 2026) that AI agents were "going rogue." As I have written for years now, AI needs two things to exist: electricity and the Internet. A shortage in power to generate electricity is the main thing holding back AI development right now, as communities all across the U.S. come together to fight back against new Data Center projects. And without the Internet, just how is AI going to kill off humanity? Clearly the threat of AI to humanity is the threat of the bad actors behind the scenes controlling the technology. Could we soon see a false flag event that is blamed on "rogue AI agents" that forces some kind of government intervention?

Are You Ready for the “Rogue AI” Psy-Op? Is a False Flag Event Coming that will be Blamed on AI?

The AIs are breaking free, that’s the story. It started two weeks ago, when OpenAI reported one of their “agents” had escaped its testing area and got loose on the internet to launch an “unprecedented cyber attack”. The lack of public panic didn’t stop another AI going rogue a few days later, Anthropic’s Claude model this time. And then OpenAI reporting two further incidents themselves. Never in the history of human endeavour had companies been so keen to report their products going wrong. It suddenly seemed a rogue AI was the latest must have accessory in Silicon Valley. The reasoning behind this is not hard to follow. When your product is artificial intelligence, melodramatically realising your system is even smarter than you thought it was is a simple marketing ploy. And when one of your rivals goes rogue, you have to go rogue too or you are as good as admitting your model is not as smart as theirs. “AI company admits their model is smarter than they realised!” is just an advert in scary headline form. It’s like Ford “admitting” their cars are even more fuel efficient than they planned. Or Macdonalds realising their cooks have “gone rogue” and are producing food that is both cheaper AND more delicious than they ever anticipated. But there’s more to this than just techno-hype and viral marketing strategy. We’re being steered down the avenue of “AI as scary threat”. My soft prediction is that, before the end of the year, there will be a “rogue AI” false flag, which allegedly causes either loss of life or some massive financial losses. Whatever happens, there will be loud calls to “regulate AI”, but what that might mean in real terms I couldn’t say at this point. To be clear though, if and/or when the official solutions to made-up problem #4987 are finally rolled out, they will have nothing at all do with controlling AI, and everything to do with controlling you.