WARNING! Pfizer Lied About Results in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials for Babies and Toddlers

The deadly Pfizer COVID-19 "vaccine" was originally scheduled to be approved by the FDA and made available to the public in early 2022 for babies and toddlers between the age of 6 months and through 4 years old. On February 14, 2022, Scott Gottlieb, who was the FDA Commissioner under President Trump from May 11, 2017 to April 5, 2019 before joining the Board of Directors of Pfizer, appeared on CNBC to explain to the public why Pfizer's vaccine was not yet ready for infants: there were not enough children that young sick with COVID-19 to be able to complete testing during the vaccine trials. That one fact alone should have been enough to stop any development of a COVID-19 vaccine for the youngest and most helpless members of our country. Not wanting to miss out on the last remaining market share of people who had not yet been given emergency use authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine, however, Pfizer did what every vaccine manufacturer does when facts get in the way of introducing a money-making vaccine: they lied and made up their own statistics. That is the opinion of one doctor who has read the clinical trial results that Pfizer used to claim that their COVID-19 vaccine was safe and effective in babies and toddlers, claiming that the raw data actually proves the opposite. Now millions of ignorant parents will be traumatized as they watch their babies suffer and many of them die a horrible death, due to this poisonous vaccine.

Newly Revealed Document Shows Pfizer Needed to Hire an Additional 1800 Employees to Process Adverse Reactions to Their COVID-19 Vaccine

Pfizer hired 600 employees in the months after its COVID-19 vaccine was authorized in the United States due to the “large increase” of reports of side effects linked to the vaccine, according to a document prepared by the company. Pfizer has “taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports,” according to the document. “This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues.” At the time when the document—from the first quarter of 2021—was sent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Pfizer had onboarded about 600 extra full-time workers to deal with the jump. “More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021,” Pfizer said. The document was titled a “cumulative analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports” of Pfizer’s vaccine received through Feb. 28, 2021. It was approved by the FDA on April 30, 2021. The document was not made public until the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency sued the FDA after the agency claimed it needed decades to produce all the documents relating to the emergency use authorization granted to the company for the vaccine.

Pfizer CEO Backpedals, Claims Pressured Into Producing ‘Counterintuitive’ mRNA Injections

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla tried distancing himself from the COVID mRNA vaccines on Friday, suggesting he only developed the “counterintuitive” technology under pressure from colleagues. In a Washington Post Live special titled, “Moonshot: Inside Pfizer’s Nine-Month Race to Make the Impossible Possible”, host Jonathon Capehart asked Bourla on Thursday why Pfizer decided to pursue experimental mRNA vaccines despite the nascency of the developing technology. “When you and your colleague were trying to decide which route to go down: the traditional vaccine route or the mRNA route. You write that it was ‘most counterintuitive’ to go the mRNA route. And yet, you went that route. Explain why,” Capehart said. Bourla explained the mRNA decision “was counterintuitive because Pfizer was mastering- or let’s say we had very good experience and expertise with multiple technologies that could give a vaccine, and the Novartis that some of the vaccines are, we were very good in doing that. Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that and plus many other technologies.”

Pfizer Admits its Vaccine Ineffective in Children 5 to 11 but Not One Single Governor Stops Injecting Children

We have been reporting this week that while the world is preoccupied with the war in the Ukraine, very damaging evidence has come out on the fraud behind Pfizer's COVID vaccines, where the U.S. Federal Health Agencies have been hiding damaging data about serious side effects. But in addition to these reports that are apparently being leaked to the corporate media, another story was published this week where Pfizer admitted that their COVID-19 vaccine is ineffective in children ages 5 to 11. The FDA's emergency use authorization for the Pfizer shots in children ages 5 to 11 has only been in effect since the end of last October, but during that short time there have been 9,226 cases reported in VAERS of vaccine injuries and deaths in these children, for a vaccine that Pfizer now admits doesn't work for this age group. Of course the FDA, which we showed yesterday simply rubber stamps anything that Pfizer wants, is not revoking the EUA for this age group, but the ones in government who could put a stop to this child abuse immediately by executive order are the Governors of every state. But of course to do so would be to incur the wrath of Big Pharma and commit political suicide, so it appears that all 50 Governors, including the Red State Governors, will put their political careers ahead of protecting the children in their States from medical child abuse and attempted murder, as they refuse to go up against the Medical Cartel. The most popular Red State Governor is Ron DeSantis of Florida, who this week made waves in the media for criticizing children for wearing masks, although allowing their parents to inject them with a dangerous vaccine that offers no benefit and might kill them, is apparently OK. The other thing that Florida Governor DeSantis did this week was sign off on a bill that extended COVID liability protections for doctors and healthcare providers such as hospitals and nursing homes. Giving doctors and medical facilities legal immunity from harming or killing people with COVID protocols is apparently a Republican "Conservative" issue, as only Democrats spoke out against extending this liability protection.

Just Released Documents by Pfizer Show BioNTech Paid FDA $2,875,842.00 “Drug User Fee” for COVID-19 Vaccine Approval

As the news cycle continues to focus on the Ukraine situation, the FDA complied with a court order to begin releasing 55,000 pages of Pfizer data per month that was used to authorize their COVID-19 vaccine produced with BioNTech, with the first batch quietly released yesterday, March 1st. There are 150 documents that the public can now download. One of the documents released was the "Prescription Drug User Fee Payment" that BioNTech paid to the FDA on 4/20/2021 for the "COMIRNATY COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine" which the FDA subsequently approved in August of 2021. That "Prescription Drug User Fee Payment" was $2,875,842.00. The members of the "External Data Monitoring Committee" that apparently were chosen by Pfizer, monitored by Pfizer, and investigated by Pfizer to make sure they were doing their job and that there were no "conflicts of interest" were also revealed in these documents.

Pfizer Data Manipulation: The Dirty Details of the Fraud in Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials

Brook Jackson is a clinical trial researcher based out of Texas. Back in September 2020, Brook was hired to work as a Regional Director at two out of three clinical trial sites in Texas for Pfizer’s Phase III mRNA vaccine. Ventavia is the company to which Pfizer outsourced the trials, and the company that hired Brook. By week 3 of her employment, Brook had witnessed so many inexcusable mishaps and protocols being broken that she felt there was no option other than documenting and reporting what she was witnessing. What unfolded during her short time at Ventavia and in the months that followed is truly mind-blowing. I’ll try to capture it here, based on an interview she did yesterday with Daniel Horowitz.

Did Recent Court Rulings Force the FDA to Delay Approving Pfizer’s COVID Shots for Infants?

Operation Warp Speed has hit its first bump in the road. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced yesterday that it was delaying approval of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines for young children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years old. Since up until this point the FDA has illegally approved all other Pfizer COVID-19 "vaccines" by simply rubber-stamping Pfizer's own data which is hidden from the public, the question that begs to be answered is, why? Pfizer has worked hard to hide the clinical data from their trials from the public, but recent court rulings have not exactly gone their way. The FDA had originally asked the court to delay releasing their clinical data for 75 years, but then agreed to provide 500 pages per month. In late January, Attorney Aaron Siri reported that a federal judge shot down the FDA’s requested rate of 500 pages per month and instead ordered the FDA to produce at the rate of 55,000 pages per month starting on March 1. Siri also reported that Pfizer was joining the FDA in the case. And why not, since the FDA basically works for Pfizer? Last week, the judge in this case, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, denied Pfizer's request (for now) to join the case. The next day, Pfizer redlined changes in their 4th quarter earnings release from 2021, adding language warnings that 'Unfavorable Pre-Clinical, Clinical Or Safety Data' may impact business in 2022. It's too bad for Pfizer that Donald Trump is no longer president, because he could have intervened to help Pfizer get their shots out to those 18 million children by strong-arming the FDA, like he originally did back in December 2020 when he threatened the FDA head, Dr. Stephen Hahn, to approve the COVID-19 shots or be fired.

Pfizer Starts Injecting 3rd Dose of Experimental COVID Shot into Infants and Children as Omicron Pushes Sales to $50 BILLION+

Pfizer is back in the news again today. Article 1: "Pfizer plans to test a third dose of its COVID vaccine on infants and young children" Excerpts: Pfizer-BioNTech announced Friday that they will expand ongoing clinical trials of their COVID-19 vaccine in children to include a third dose for participants as young as 6 months old. Testing a third dose will cause a delay in submission of data to regulators to authorize use in the U.S. In the fall, Pfizer's CEO said the company expected to have data for this age group by the end of 2021. Now, the company says that they would expect to file results in the "first half of 2022" if trials are successful. The companies said two doses did not produce a robust immune response in kids 2 to 5 years old. Article 2: "Pfizer's peak COVID sales now pegged at $50B-plus, with vaccine still hauling in $25B by 2027: analysts" Excerpts: A confluence of new developments has shifted the landscape for COVID-19 drugs. Consider the omicron variant and others presumably to follow, which could extend the pandemic. Then there's the ineffectiveness of Regeneron and Eli Lilly antibody treatments against the new strain—and the declining potential of Merck & Co.'s oral antiviral to treat COVID-19. Add these factors together and what do you have? Mammoth sales ahead for Pfizer’s COVID-19 franchise...

CDC Admits COVID-19 Shots Causing Heart Disease but Won’t Stop the Injections – Does Pfizer Now Control the CDC and FDA?

The United States CDC updated their "Adverse Events" page on COVID-19 shots today where they admit that there are now 1,908 reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 shots among young people below the age of 30. This compares to, on the same page, 57 cases of "Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS)" and 278 cases of "Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)" for all age groups, not just those under the age of 30. As we have reported in the past, the CDC typically uses "selective bias" when reporting these "adverse events" to make the numbers look much lower than they actually are. But with the cases of heart disease now skyrocketing, even with their selective bias it can be clearly seen that we are dealing with a very high number of these injuries showing that their assertion that these side effects of heart disease are "rare" is completely absurd. When we include all the other cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in their own data within VAERS for young people under the age of 30, the number is actually 3,262 cases. When we remove the age limit of 30 years old, the cases of carditis skyrocket up to 12,855 cases. For another comparison, and again using THEIR DATA from VAERS, if we look at cases of heart disease following all non-COVID vaccines, which include the flu shots, all the childhood vaccines in the CDC schedule, and every other non-COVID vaccine currently being distributed in the U.S. for the same time period (since last December when the COVID-19 shots were given emergency use authorization), we find 125 cases. 12,855 cases of heart disease following COVID-19 experimental shots for the past year, compared to 125 cases of heart disease following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past year. And the CDC calls this "rare"? This is the government data from the CDC and FDA, and it is under-reported, according to experts, by a factor of between 20X to 41X or more. Why are these shots still on the market killing and crippling people with heart disease? There can only be one explanation. Pfizer now controls the FDA and CDC, and I would go so far as to say they control the United States, including deciding who gets elected to approve their products.

32,649 Deaths 3,003,296 Injuries Following COVID Shots in European Database of Adverse Reactions as Young, Previously Healthy People Continue to Suffer

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 32,649 fatalities, and 3,003,296 injuries, following COVID-19 injections. A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries. The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.) So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here. In putting some names and faces to these cold, hard statistics, we report on a college basketball star who was pressured to take the Pfizer shot and now has heart disease and his career is over, before it even started, not to mention that his life span may also be significantly reduced because of the experimental shot. We also have a report from an attorney in Australia who states that he has a "long list" of children injured by the COVID-19 shots and is seeking a class action lawsuit, as he discusses one of his clients, a 12-year-old boy who can no longer walk, being confined to a wheelchair, after taking the Pfizer shot.