Bitchute Telegram Feed

Prenatal and Neonatal Infant Deaths Skyrocket Worldwide Since COVID-19 Vaccines Started

For many years we have reported how vaccines have been used as a means to control birth rates in an effort to reduce the world's population, especially in developing countries like many in Africa. In 2014 we reported how the tetanus shot was distributed in Kenya by the United Nations, but only given to girls and young women who were child-bearing ages, but not boys, and later it was discovered that these "tetanus shots" contained the HCG antigen which is used in anti-fertility vaccines. So it is no surprise to those of us who have been "anti-vaccine" for many years now and covering these issues, that the COVID-19 "vaccines" are causing the deaths of prenatal and neonatal babies worldwide to skyrocket, giving strong evidence that this is part of the efforts to reduce the world's population. The only thing that has changed, is that this effort to reduce the world's population is now happening in every country, including rich western nations, and not just in poor countries. In Scotland, it was just reported that an investigation into a "very unusual" spike in deaths among newborn babies in Scotland occurred for the second time in just six months. Spikes in infant deaths are also being reported from funeral homes, as this report from Australia cites whistleblowers who are too afraid to come forward and report this. As of the latest update to the U.S. Government's Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) there have now been 4,154 fetal deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccines, a period of about 17 months. For the previous 30 years prior to the launch of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines, there were only 2,239 fetal deaths from ALL FDA-approved vaccines. And yet, the criminal FDA and CDC continue to recommend the COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women.

Read More

India Supreme Court Rules Against COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates

A landmark judgment was passed against vaccine mandates in India which has now made it illegal for anyone to discriminate between people on the basis of their vaccination status. As a result of this decision, people who were removed from their jobs and not paid salaries due to them not being vaccinated have already started being reinstated and some have even been given compensation for the same. The people of India are very fortunate to have a Supreme Court rule for the protection of public health and not the pharmaceutical companies. Hopefully, the lawsuit filed against Bill Gates for murder and asking for the Death Penalty will also be successful.

Read More

California Bill to let 12-Year-Olds Get Vaccine Without Parental Consent Passes State Senate

SB 866 by Senators Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) to allow children ages 12 to 17 to take the COVID-19 vaccine without parental consent, just passed the California State Senate Thursday. As Karen England with the  Capitol Resource Institute explained to the Globe in March, “This legislative body is relentless in their pursuit to strip away parental rights as they also fast-track SB 866, a bill that will give minors as young as 12 years-old the ability to consent to any FDA approved vaccination WITHOUT parental consent. This bill not only strips parents of their right to make important decisions regarding their child’s health, but it also places minors in a potentially dangerous situation. If a minor were to have an immediate adverse reaction to a vaccine, the parent would not know. Parents MUST be allowed to be the decision makers when it comes to the health of their children.”

Read More

Wheat Farmland Under Threat Worldwide As USDA Reveals Dismal Grain Outlook

Across the world, top wheat-producing regions are experiencing adverse weather conditions that could threaten production. In places like Ukraine, a military invasion by Russia has slashed production significantly. All of this suggests the world is on the cusp of a food crisis.

Read More

DOD Edits Medical Database to Hide Military COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries as U.S. Military is Decimated by the Mandatory Shots

Back in March this year the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against Navy Seals being entitled to a religious exemption for COVID-19 vaccine mandates. One of the whistleblowers in the case was Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, a 38-year career military commander. He is a Green Beret Commander having served in the Special Forces, and he is a military doctor, serving as a Flight Surgeon and combat medic. He has earned the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal, as well as other military awards for his service. Lt. Col. Peter Chambers became a whistleblower after suffering neurological issues following mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, and seeing similar vaccine injuries in other soldiers, including: strokes, blood clots, cerebral bleeding, and various neurological injuries. He began to research vaccine injuries following the COVID-19 vaccines that were mandated for service members, in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) sponsored by the DOD. Now, Just the News is reporting that Dr. Chambers and other military medical doctor whistleblowers can no longer depend upon the data in DMED because "[The] DOD took down, edited and restored the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database earlier this year after whistleblowers including Chambers testified on the reported spike (in vaccine injuries) in a legal challenge." It appears to be a forgone conclusion now that our military is "being decimated" by COVID-19 vaccine injuries, just as Dr. Chambers stated back in March, at the same time that the current Administration is picking fights with Russia over Ukraine, and China over Taiwan. What happens next? Will a foreign force or perhaps a UN force be able to just annex the United States and take over our government without even having to fire a shot? Are there still enough soldiers left in our armed forces to repel a foreign invasion? Are there enough local militia groups and honest law enforcement, such as Constitutional Sheriffs, left to defend our neighborhoods?

Read More

A Judge Finally Called BS on “Shaken Baby Syndrome”

Some of the most tragic stories we have covered over the years have been about parents and caregivers being wrongly convicted for "child abuse" through what is known as "Shaken Baby Syndrome" (SBS). Doctors and other experts who expose the junk science behind SBS and testify in court have estimated that tens of thousands of parents and caregivers are sitting in prisons wrongly convicted for this failed medical theory. We have compiled an entire eBook on this topic documenting just how we have arrived at this unjust practice that allows the medical kidnapping of children and false incarceration of parents, and we usually sell it for $9.99 but for a limited time we are offering it for free. Fortunately, some judges are now recognizing that SBS is based on junk science, and many cases are beginning to be overturned.  Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg writing for The Appeal brings us a report of one judge in New Jersey who is speaking out.

Read More

China Lockdowns Leading to Total Control of Population as Health Authorities Decide Who Can Participate in Society While Others are Locked up in Quarantine Camps

The lockdowns currently happening in China's largest cities, which include Shanghai, parts of Beijing, and other major metropolitan areas, continue to be the biggest news story today, even though Chinese authorities are working hard to suppress any news about the killer lockdowns that are leading to suicides, starvation, and mass incarcerations at quarantine "camps". Even the World Health Organization's recent criticism of China's COVID policies is being censored inside China. These massive lockdowns are destroying the economy of China, and everyone around the world will feel its effects in the weeks and months ahead. But besides the economic consequences which will spread beyond China's borders, we can see in China just what the Globalists have in store for their version of a new society in a New World Order. And while the measures taken to achieve these goals will look different in various countries, we should fully expect that the goals will be the same, which is total control of the population, where governments use medical tyranny to decide who gets to participate in society, and who does not. For example, in certain districts in Shanghai recently they allowed some of the people to leave their homes to make a "privileged" visit to an approved grocery store. The customers have to enter the store in a carefully controlled group, show their passes and an "invitation card" issued by the store, and have a negative "nucleic acid" test result, then scan a "location code" and then pass temperature and mask checks. Shopping time is limited to 40 minutes per group, and then the store has to be disinfected for 20 minutes before the next group enters. This is the "new norm" as China is building 9000 permanent PCR testing stations for "life after lockdowns," where anyone who wants to enter any public space must take a PCR test and have a negative result. So for everyone outside of China, this is your warning to prepare now if you want to resist whatever tyrannical actions that are being planned for your country, if you don't want to give the State total control of your life.

Read More

Will Supreme Court Let Bayer-Monsanto Off the Hook for Cancer-Causing Glyphosate Herbicide Roundup?

In June of 2020 it was announced that Bayer-Monsanto had reached the "largest settlement in pharma history" by agreeing to pay $10 Billion to settle about 125,000 lawsuits by people who died or came down with cancer from glyphosate poisoning, the main ingredient in Roundup, the world's most heavily used herbicide (weed killer) that is found in most food today. But there is one lawsuit that Bayer has contested, where plaintiff Edwin Hardeman was awarded $80 million in damages due to having non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a known side effect to too much exposure with glyphosate. The trial court judge reduced his settlement award to $25 million, and Bayer appealed the decision, which was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. It is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar has recommended that the Supreme Court deny Bayer's appeal. The stakes are high, as the Supreme Court's ruling could affect all future lawsuits against Bayer-Monsanto, and possibly even past lawsuits. What will the Supreme Court do, and just what are the Wall Street Billionaires and Bankers who largely control the Supreme Court planning behind the scenes in all of this? To rule in favor of Bayer could save investors $billions, and allow the EPA to continue to authorize the use of the world's most deadly herbicide to continue to be sold and used to poison our food supply. If they allow the decision of the Ninth Circuit to stand, how will that affect what the EPA does next regarding approving Roundup for agricultural use? While many people and groups have been calling on a ban of glyphosate-based herbicides, the fact is that if it is banned outright immediately, a very significant percentage of agriculture will no longer be able to produce food, as certain crops, such as corn, are over 90% genetically modified and could not grow without the herbicide Roundup. It would take many years to transition to something else. Whatever the reasons are behind the scenes for what the Supreme Court does, the stakes are high, and the results could be disastrous no matter which way the High Court rules. The best case scenario would be to allow all these lawsuits from people killed or injured by glyphosate to receive their settlements, and to put pressure on the EPA to start phasing out the use of Roundup giving farmers enough time to make the transition, so as to not bring major disruptions to the already fragile food supplies. But in that scenario the people would win, and Wall Street would lose, and that is just not something I see happening much, if at all, in today's judicial system.

Read More

Australian Children Are Dying After Pfizer COVID Injections

During a 17-day period in March 2022: 2 boys aged 6 and 7; and, a 9-year-old girl died after being injected with Pfizer’s “vaccine” – and there are many more victims. Up to 10 April the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) received around 1,200 adverse reaction reports to Covid injections in children aged 5-11. The latest summary of adverse events was published by the TGA on 5 May 2022. It shows that 124,669 adverse events post-Covid injection have been reported – a rate of 2.2 per 1,000 doses.  Regarding Pfizer injections given to children the TGA states: “To 1 May 2022, we have received about 4,112 reports … in 12-17-year-olds. The most commonly reported reactions are chest pain, headache, dizziness, nausea and fever … we have received about 1,311 reports from … Comirnaty (Pfizer) doses administered in [5 to 11-year-olds]. The most common reactions reported included chest pain, vomiting, fever, headache and abdominal pain. ATAGI [Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation] advises that people who develop myocarditis attributed to their first vaccine dose should defer further doses of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine and discuss this with their treating doctor.” As of 27 April 2022, the latest information publicly available on the Database of Adverse Events Notification (“DAEN”), there had been 839 reports where death was the outcome post-injection.

Read More

44,348 Dead 4,279,200 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions as More Pfizer Fraud Uncovered

The European (EEA and non-EEA countries) database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, verified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and they are now reporting 44,348 fatalities, and 4,279,200 injuries following injections of five experimental COVID-19 shots. The latest Pfizer documents released by the FDA show evidence of more fraud during the COVID-19 vaccine trials. The number of people that were allegedly enrolled for the studies appeared very quickly, suggesting that fraud was committed. The Exposé has also just published an article about the Pfizer documents reporting that Pfizer knew during the trials that their COVID-19 vaccines "shed" and contaminated others who did not take the shot, and that a new study corroborates this. And Ed Dowd, an equity investment executive, reports that funeral homes and insurance companies continue to see increased deaths following COVID-19 vaccines.

Read More