Melania Trump Wants to Monitor You and Your Family’s Mental Health in Your Home to Stop School Shootings

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

After the horrific mass shooting in a Catholic grade school in Minnesota that has been headline news this week, Melania Trump announced her support for “behavioral threat assessments across all levels of society—beginning in our homes, extending through school districts and of course, social media platforms.”

This of course begs the question as to what the standards will be for judging what is “good” and “bad” “mental health”.

More than likely they will use “Predictive Analysis” software, which has been around for almost a decade already, and is used in the U.S. Foster Care system with Child Protective Services (CPS) to justify taking children away from their parents through medical kidnapping, before they show any signs of being a “bad parent”, as “pre-emptive intervention”, just like Melania is promoting.

See this article we published almost 7 years ago now:

CPS Using “Predictive Analytics” Software to Label Parents as Unfit, Even Before Baby is Born

Involuntary psychiatric abduction and confinement is already rampant in the U.S., with nearly as many people being forced to be confined in hospitals as there are people being incarcerated in jails and prisons.

California and many other states are now trying to keep homeless people off of the streets by confining them in psychiatric wards.

Here is a recent report from Jan Eastgate, president of Citizens Commission on Human Rights International.

Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment Of The Homeless: A Dangerous, Costly Failure

Expanding forced psychiatric treatment revives failed 1960s policies—causing trauma, violating rights, draining public funds, and enriching a system rooted in coercion, not care.

Excerpts:

Key Facts

Coercive Psychiatry Won’t Solve Homelessness: Involuntary psychiatric commitment is being wrongly promoted as a solution to homelessness. Evidence shows it worsens outcomes, increases trauma, and diverts resources from real support.

Involuntary Commitment Causes Harm: Nearly doubles risk of suicide, overdose, or violence post-discharge. Studies show no improved long-term outcomes—only greater relapse and trauma.

No Cures—Only Drug-Induced Damage: Psychiatric drugs don’t cure—cause irreversible harm (e.g., tardive dyskinesia, akathisia). The Alaska Supreme Court ruled against forced drugging due to severe risks.

Massive Cost with No Return: Up to $1.1 million/year per person for forced psychiatric detainment and “treatment”. Medicaid/Emergency Room systems also bear the cost—the homeless pay in harm, the public in dollars.

Civil Rights Violations & Lawsuits: Involuntary commitment violates the 14th Amendment and due process. Legal payouts have resulted in $1.1 million for wrongful psychiatric detention.

Fraud Thrives in Forced Treatment: Acadia Healthcare, a psychiatric hospital chain, and others paid millions for related unlawful detainment, false billing. Coercive systems drive up profit while harming patients

Failed 1960s Psychiatric Policy Repackaged: Repeats old model: drugging instead of care. Fueled today’s homelessness—won’t fix it now.

Initiatives to expand psychiatric powers to involuntarily commit the homeless are not acts of care. Rather, they rehash the failed policies of the 1960s that placed vulnerable individuals on powerful, brain-disabling drugs and helped create the homeless situation we face today.

Amid rising homelessness, the common narrative—driven by the psychiatric industry—frames involuntary treatment as care, despite evidence that it fails to improve long-term outcomes.

Yet, mounting research shows this approach not only fails to reduce homelessness or improve long-term outcomes—it significantly increases the risks of suicide, overdose, and violent encounters post-discharge.

A July 2025 study found that individuals involuntarily hospitalized for psychiatric reasons were nearly twice as likely to die by suicide or overdose, within just three months of release.[1]

Legislators seeking cost-effective, humane, and evidence-based solutions should take heed: forced psychiatric treatment has a track record of harm, high public expense, and systemic abuse.

Forced Psychiatric Treatment Fails—And Worsens Outcomes

Studies show forced hospitalization causes more harm than help:

The above July 2025 U.S. study reported 1.2 million people are involuntarily hospitalized each year—making it as common as incarceration.

As Pim Welle, chief data scientist in Allegheny County, noted: “Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization research “is likely the first to establish a causal link between hospitalization and harm a person experiences after they’re discharged.”[2]

A 2014 study of over 50,000 cases found psychiatric hospitalization raised suicide risk 44 times compared to no treatment.[3]

A 2017 JAMA Psychiatry meta-analysis confirmed suicide risk was 100 times greater immediately after psychiatric discharge.[4]

Harvard Public Health (2023) found that all 22 individuals who were followed post-involuntary commitment relapsed within a year; two died.[5]

Even Dr. Peter Gøtzsche, a leading medical researcher, states: “It has never been shown that forced treatment does more good than harm, and it is highly likely the opposite is true.”[6]

Read the full article.

Psychiatrists Are Among Top Criminals in the U.S.

Unholy Assault: Psychiatry Versus Religion

What is the state of religion today?

In an American town, senior citizens were told they could not sing Gospel songs or pray over their meals in their community center because it was a public building. Only after an extensive lawsuit were their rights vindicated.

A child was told she could not give pencils to her school friends that had the word “Jesus” printed on them. Crying, she asked her mom, “Why does the school hate Jesus?”

Mr. Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel for the Liberty Legal Institute, testified before the US Congress hearing on religious expression in 2004,

“These young kids get the message. Their religion is treated the same as a curse word. These children are being taught at an early age, ‘keep your religion to yourself’, ‘it’s dirty’, ‘it’s bad.’”

Obviously, attacks on religion are alive and well, but then they are also as old as religion itself.

However, reports of sexual perversion among clergy that have stained the headlines of almost every country in the world, with multimillion-dollar lawsuits filed and won against the churches involved, are something entirely new. Here, churches face an insidious assault that is not only sapping their spiritual and material strength, but in some cases threatens their very survival.

While this type of deadly affront is new, its origins date back to the late 1800s. It was then that psychiatrists first sought to replace religion with their “soulless science.”

In 1940, psychiatry openly declared its plans when British psychiatrist John Rawlings Rees, a cofounder of the World Federation for Mental Health (WFMH), addressed a National Council of Mental Hygiene stating:

“[S]ince the last world war we have done much to infiltrate the various social organizations throughout the country…we have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church.…”

Another cofounder of the WFMH, Canadian psychiatrist G. Brock Chisholm, reinforced this master plan in 1945 by targeting religious values and calling for psychiatrists to free

“the race…from its crippling burden of good and evil.” Viciously usurping age-old religious principles, psychiatrists have sanitized criminal conduct and defined sin and evil as “mental disorders.”

In his book The Death of Satan, author Andrew Delbanco refers to the disappearing “language of evil” and the process of “unnaming evil.”

Until psychiatry’s emergence, societies had operated with very clear ideas on “moral evil.”

Today, however, we hear euphemisms like “behavioral problem” or “personality disorder.” Delbanco describes these as notions

“…in which the concept of responsibility has disappeared and the human being is reconceived as a component with a stipulated function. If it fails to perform properly, it is subject to repair or disposal; but there is no real sense of blame involved.…We think in terms of adjusting the faulty part or, if it is too far gone, of putting it away.”

As a result of psychiatrists’ subversive plan for religion, the concepts of good and bad behavior, right and wrong conduct and personal responsibility have taken such a beating that people today have few or no guidelines for checking, judging or directing their behavior. Words like ethics, morals, sin and evil have almost disappeared from everyday usage.

Read the full article here. As far as I know, this article was written more than 15 years ago, but it sounds exactly like what is happening today.

Related:

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

We Are Now on Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.

If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.

Published on August 28, 2025