Original image source.

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

By now I am sure that almost everyone has heard about “Signal-Gate”, where a confidential chat session was held by Trump officials on the Signal app, just before bombing Yemen.

The editor of The Atlantic publication, Jeffrey Goldberg, was allegedly asked to join the chat “inadvertently” by National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.

Goldberg published an article about the chat, claiming that classified information was shared via the app, and that no one even noticed that he was in on the call.

This prompted the Trump administration to deny what Goldberg published, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe, who were grilled for two hours yesterday by the U.S. Senate.

They attacked Goldberg and accused him of lying, so last night Goldberg published the entire thread of the chat to defend himself.

So, about that Signal chat.

On Monday, shortly after we published a story about a massive Trump-administration security breach, a reporter asked the secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, why he had shared plans about a forthcoming attack on Yemen on the Signal messaging app.

He answered, “Nobody was texting war plans. And that’s all I have to say about that.”

At a Senate hearing yesterday, the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, and the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Ratcliffe, were both asked about the Signal chat, to which Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of The Atlantic, was inadvertently invited by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz.

“There was no classified material that was shared in that Signal group,” Gabbard told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Ratcliffe said much the same:

“My communications, to be clear, in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information.”

President Donald Trump, asked yesterday afternoon about the same matter, said,

“It wasn’t classified information.”

The statements by Hegseth, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, and Trump—combined with the assertions made by numerous administration officials that we are lying about the content of the Signal texts—have led us to believe that people should see the texts in order to reach their own conclusions.

There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared. (Source.)

Today, the Trump administration is buckling down and sticking to their story, even with the publication of the actual chat thread.

I have annotated Karoline Leavitt’s White House Press Briefing statements from earlier today, to just the questions she addressed regarding this Signal chat.

But before you listen to her scripted response, first read the entire Signal chat thread published by Jeffrey Goldberg for yourself, as I have made it available to Health Impact News readers:

Original Source.

Now, listen to Trump’s response through his White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, from earlier today. It’s just over 17 minutes.

If you want a quick summary of what she said without actually watching it, it would be: “Jeffrey Goldberg is a democrat liberal fanatic that should not be trusted, and all of this is Biden’s fault.”

One thing to notice is the use of the term “War Plans” which the Trump Administration has repeatedly denied were discussed in this chat.

Since only Congress can declare a “war”, The Atlantic and others have changed the terminology to “attack plans”.

Leavitt talked about how terrorists in Yemen were allowed to “run wild” by the Biden Administration, and that now we have killed many of their leaders.

She stated:

Do you trust the Secretary of Defense, who was nominated for this role, voted by the United States Senate into this role, has served in combat, honorably served our nation in uniform, or do you trust Jeffrey Goldberg, who is a registered democrat, and anti-Trump sensationalist reporter?

One of the reporters replied that “The American people can decide for the themselves,” since the chat messages have now been published, and so it is not really about if one should trust Goldberg instead of Pete Hegseth, since people can read the messages themselves now.

Karoline Leavitt replied:

“I am so glad you said that, because I think the American public should decide for themselves based on the outcome of this operation.”

Really? Well here is one outcome of these bombings that I have already published which the Trump administration apparently does not want to discuss.

WARNING! VERY GRAPHIC!

Revelations from this Signal Chat that NOBODY Seems to be Discussing

The problem with looking at incidents like this through political lenses and trying to find evidence that supports one’s political biases, instead of just trying to learn what is true and what is a lie, is that often other information gets overlooked because it may not fit either political narrative.

First, notice how Vice President Vance stated that he did not agree with the timing of this operation, and that the goal of bombing people in Yemen was to “send a message.”

Pete Hegseth agreed that it was going to be difficult to send the correct message, and stated that they need to stay focused on: 1. Biden failed, and 2. that Iran funds the Houthis.

Hegseth even admitted: “This is not about the Houthis“!

Wow! They were more concerned with “the message” and how this was going to help their political careers, but the fact that they were going kill people in Yemen, including innocent civilians which included babies and toddlers, was only of secondary importance!

And while the Corporate Liberal Media made a big deal over their disparaging remarks about Europe, to me the most amazing revelation made here was this by Mike Waltz:

Whether we pull the plug or not today European navies do not have the capability to defend against the types of sophisticated, antiship, cruise missiles, and drones the Houthis are now using.

Wow! If this is not “classified” information, then I don’t know what is!

Both the Biden Administration and the Trump Administration, along with the Corporate Media on BOTH political sides, have continually told the American people that the Houthis are weak, and present no threat whatsoever to the mighty U.S. military, because their weapons are so primitive.

But here Waltz is stating that the Houthis military is so strong and so advanced, that nobody in Europe can stand up to them, only the U.S. can!

If this is true of the “lowly” Houthi rebels, then how much more of a military threat is Iran and their weapons?

Trump and the Zionist MAGA crowd has stated for many years now that Iran has to be completely destroyed, before they can develop nuclear weapons.

But now that we know how big of a threat the Houthis actually are, based on what the U.S. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz says, how much more of a threat is Iran with their military power?

Perhaps this explains the sudden change in the Trump Administration, where Tulsi Gabbard has just declared that U.S. intelligence states that Iran is NOT building nuclear bombs, which is a complete turnaround from the narrative they have been pushing since Trump’s first administration?

US Intel Report Finds Iran “Not” Building Nuclear Weapon

Tulsi Gabbard, United States Director of National Intelligence (DNI), on Tuesday said that the American intelligence community have assessed that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon at the moment, but discussion of nuclearization has increased inside the regime in Tehran.

“The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003,” she said during the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (Source.)

Follow the TRUTH – Not Lying Politicians

Jesus stated:

If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.

As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. (John 15:18-19)

Does the world love you, or hate you? The Greek word used for “world” here is “kosmos“.

It doesn’t mean “If the Left hates you”, or “If the Right hates you.”

It means the WHOLE world.

If half the world loves you because you agree with their political views, then I am sorry to inform you that you are loved by the world as its own, and do not stand with Christ, according to the words of Jesus himself.

Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com.

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

The Five Child Trafficking Networks as Revealed by a Woman Who was Chosen to Succeed the “Queen Mother of Darkness” but was Rescued by Jesus Christ

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Distinguishing True Prophets from False Prophets in These Evil Modern Times

Who Controls the World? by Dr. A. True Ott

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

Fact Check: “Christianity” and the Christian Religion is NOT Found in the Bible – The Person Jesus Christ Is

Was the U.S. Constitution Written to Protect “We the People” or “We the Globalists”? Were the Founding Fathers Godly Men or Servants of Satan?